- FISA Court Colludes with NSA to Allow Unconstitutional SurveillancePosted 10 months ago
- Ron Paul says U.S. Gov’t Considers its Citizens to be the EnemyPosted 10 months ago
- U.S. Officials don’t know how much Secret Material Snowden TookPosted 10 months ago
- Nancy Pelosi: We Should Give up Liberty for Security, Snowden a Criminal – Booed by AudiencePosted 10 months ago
- US Officials Leave 700 Troops in Jordan, Patriot Missiles and Fighter Jets – Escalation of Syrian WarPosted 10 months ago
- If Obama Wants No More Snowdens, He Should Stop Spying and Assassinating, Says WikiLeaksPosted 10 months ago
- EFF Sues NSA, DOJ Over Secret Surveillance ProgramPosted 10 months ago
- Yahoo Was Reportedly Forced to Join PRISM By a Secret CourtPosted 10 months ago
- the Organic Review: Final Verdict for Raw Milk Farmer – $1,000 Fine & No Jail TimePosted 10 months ago
- US Deepens Fight in Syria; Many Skeptical of Chemical Weapons, Ron Paul says Same Rhetoric as IraqPosted 10 months ago
Montana Senate and Virginia House Pass Anti-Drone Measures
by Ali Papademetriou
SLN reported just this week that a House panel passed HB2010, a Virginia bill that would limit domestic drone surveillance use, with a 9 to 4 marginal vote on Monday. Sponsored by Delegate Benjamin L. Cline, the bill also gained support from the Senate Courts of Justice.
As was reported by TenthAmendmentCenter.com, the legislation, which would place a two-year deferment on drone use by state or local law enforcements, also passed the Virginia House on Monday, 83 to 16. The House did neglect to pass an even more stringent bill regarding limiting drone use, HB1616, one that would have vindicated drone use only with the permission of the General Assembly or local governing body, with of course a warrant.
Tenth Amendment Center’s communications director, Mike Maharrey, commented, “I’m disappointed that the Virginia House didn’t move forward with the stronger bill, but I’m glad they have passed a measure that will slow the roll on domestic drone deployment.”
In addition, the liberty advocate went on to optimistically explain, “The overwhelming support of this bill indicates Virginia lawmakers are serious about considering the civil liberty implications of using unmanned spy-planes to watch over their constituents. Hopefully, they will use the time during the two-year moratorium to develop strong measures that will keep drones out of Virginia airspace – assuming the Senate passes the bill.”
Drones in general, whether armed or used solely for surveillance, have sparked much controversy lately. Here at home, government officials argue that spying on American citizens through UAVs is an efficient way to gather criminal evidence, while liberty advocates argue that government ability to spy on citizens, especially without a warrant, is a complete encroachment on the people’s Fourth Amendment.
SLN has also recently reported on lawmakers from three different states, Missouri, North Dakota, and Indiana, who have introduced legislations that would either require a warrant in order to use unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or drone surveillance, or nullify drone use.
Now, in addition to the House passing Virginia’s similar measure, Montana is moving in a comparable direction. On Tuesday, the Montana Senate passed SB150, which was introduced in January by Senator Robyn Driscoll, by a 32 to 17 margin.
The legislation would deem evidence collected through drone surveillance irrelevant in a criminal hearing, which definitely wiped the smiles off of the government officials’ faces that argue that drone use is necessary to collect criminal evidence. Also, the bill would disable anyone from owning a drone with any weapons attached.